I recently spoke to a group of graduate students at Boston University about representations of Native Americans in children’s and YA literature. I was once again reminded of the importance of this work because so many of these students had heard of only one book by a Native author (Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutly True Diary of a Part-Time Indian).
I highlighted this excellent graphic published by Cooperative Children’s Book Center, School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison (link here) and then spoke about Ghosts, a graphic novel we can all just skip.
Although I began the evening by addressing some of the multiple problems in Raina Telgemeier’s Ghosts (see Debbie Reese, Yuyi Morales and my blog post), I didn’t stop there. Instead, I took advantage of the time and promoted books and authors who, in my opinion, got it right.
I read from Tim Tingle’s How I Became a Ghost, and gushed over The Lesser Blessed by Richard Van Camp, and talked about Sherman Alexie’s other books. As I talked and answered questions I noticed something important – people were on their screens. Ipads were out, cell phones were on, laptop screens were up and eyes were no longer directed towards me.
Now, usually academics HATE it when electronics take center stage while we are talking. It usually means we have lost the audience, their attention drawn to FaceBook, or shoe shopping or the latest poll numbers. But, as I walked them through what it means to be a mis- and under represented person, spoke about how to read for authenticity, and mentioned blogs to be checked, I didn’t mind seeing the distraction.
Because, I knew what they were doing.
They were ordering books.
They were putting their dollars where it matters.
After my a few people expressed concern and disappointment that they had never heard of the books I mentioned. In addition, they expressed worry that when they looked for books about non-White, straight, male or cis-gender, able people they were unsure whether or not the book was “good” or not. Some felt unsure about purchasing books when they might not recognize authentic representations vs familiar stereotypes and tropes. In other words, they WANT to read the good stuff but right now in their development they aren’t sure about what is the good stuff. Fair enough.
Introducing the 2016 Amazon-Hack-a-Thon for children’s and YA literature!
Here’s how it is going to work. People are going to suggest children’s and YA books that provide authentic representations – not stereotypes and tropes! No smiling slaves or lesbians getting shock treatment! People on the autism spectrum who are not freaky-math-geniuses. Mexicans who aren’t gardeners. Asian women who are not submissive. Non-White, straight, male, and able people who exist for themselves and not as simple props in the story, there save White people with wisdom!
Where was I? Oh … Right.
- First step, books. Go here to suggest books.
- Second step, read. Go HERE to see the list of suggested books. Read one (or more).
- Third step, write. Return to the list of suggested books and follow the included Amazon link or find it on your own. At that point, if you feel like it, write a positive review. You can also cross-post your review on GoodReads if you are a member.
- If you see another positive review that you agree with, click on the YES button next to “Was this review helpful to you?”
Your review doesn’t have to be long or intricate. Instead, write a paragraph about what the book made you think about, how it made your feel when you read, what it reminded you of, or what surprised you. Focus on what you liked, how the book challenged you or made you think. Then publish it to Amazon or Goodreads.
That’s it. Please share this post widely. Maybe we can catch the attention of other readers. Maybe we can help authors by getting the word out about their books. Maybe we can get publishers to notice when those books get more sales. Maybe we can amplify each other’s voices.
6 thoughts on “Amplifying #Own Voices”
I love love love this idea, but the link to the list of suggested books doesn’t seem to work. I’m so distressed by how much ‘positive’ buzz Ghost is getting these days, in spite of a number of people talking about the issues with it.
Let me check the link ! Thanks.
Ok- Adjusted the link. Try it now or use this one
It’s frustrating and heartbreaking that publishers seem to think that characters can only have one “defining quality” – a character can be Asian, but not an Asian lesbian, or autistic, but not autistic and Native American – there’s a limit to just how diverse they’re willing to go. As a librarian I am desperate for more diversity in LGBTQ materials for young people, for example – finding POC LGBTQ characters is a real challenge, and don’t even bother trying to find LGBTQ characters with disabilities, which is ridiculous, as just within my own circle of friends and relatives I can name more than a few people who fall into several different categories, each one a real and valid part of their identity.
Let’s make this happen.
What a fabulous idea! I’ve added the ones that I could think of off the top of my head 🙂
Perfect ! That’s what I’m looking for.